Sunday, March 4, 2012

Student Faces Prison for Speaking Out in Royalist Thailand


     The lèse majesté law, also known as Article 112 in Thailand, states that no person shall commit an offense or crime against the ruler or supreme power of a state. The ramifications of this law has caused the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to voice her opposition of Article 112, “we are concerned about the ongoing trials and harsh sentencing of people convicted of lèse majesté in Thailand and the chilling effect that this is having on freedom of expression in the country.” She continues by urging Thailand authorities to amend the laws on lèse majesté. I appreciate the position that she is in and the delicacy with which this situation needs to be handled but amendment is no longer the answer to this problem. Article 112 needs to be abolished.

      Discussion and criticism of the monarchy in Thailand results in a jail term lasting anywhere from three to 15 years. Opponents of the law argue that it prevents dialogue and is being used as a political tool to stifle dissent. These claims have no shortage of evidence to support them as the number of people prosecuted for lèse majesté in Thailand has jumped from an average of one case per year prior to 2006, the year of the military coup that ousted former PM Thaksin Shinawatra, to over 400 since 2006. 

Somyot, labor activist and editor, was arrested in April 2011
     
     Those who are charged are often denied bail for extended periods of time while awaiting trial; a situation especially true for members of the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship, also known as the Red Shirts. You can find more information here about political prisoners who have been arrested for lèse majesté in Thailand and have been denied bail.

     Among those who find themselves prosecuted for lèse majesté is 20-year-old Kanthoop, a university student who refused to stand in the cinema for the national anthem that plays prior to every film. “That was the moment for me,” she says. “I decided that I have the right to stand up or not, to pay respect to whatever I believe in.” This is an unpopular stance to take in Thailand where the monarchy is respected and revered and those who criticize it are vilified and often charged. For more information about Kanthoop’s story click here.

Red Shirts protest Article 112
    
     The danger of Article 112 is that it creates an atmosphere of silence. The monarchy is respected because to not do so would be treason. The threat of jail is being used by political figures to trample any opposition and shut the mouths of expression. To find out how you can help people like Kanthoop visit this link.


     “The King shall be enthroned in a position of revered worship and shall not be violated. No person shall expose the King to any sort of accusation or action.”
           -Thai Constitution, Section 8 

8 comments:

  1. A very interesting story. This group has been active since 2006. I wonder if change will happen.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I appreciate you posting this Brad. It is a great demonstration of the contrast in our rights compared to other countries. We tend to take these things for granted.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad you enjoy it. I've been trying to find news from different parts of the world each week in order to contrast those stories with what we take for granted every single day. It's my hopes that through this blog some readers may begin to appreciate all that they have and understand that by knowing what is happening around the world it is possible to influence change. Whether this is through online petitions or connecting through social networking sites.

      Delete
  3. Interesting.It looks like this will be a long fight.Thailand is a monarchy and I don't see things changing (one article in the constitution)when the political regime is still the same.But, I admire the courage of people who want the change.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is very an important issue and I'm glad your bring it to light Brad. I confess I didn't know Thailand has such a tight grip on free speech. As long as people can change, Thailand can change.

    ReplyDelete
  5. When I was in Thailand it was completely hush - hush to speak of the royal family at all, especially if you weren't mentioning their greatness. It was a very odd realization that people are controlled from speaking what they wish about their own governing body. It is a wonder that people still adore the King, but I can't say the same for the prince...

    A very interesting post Brad, I appreciate your perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I really enjoy your blog Brad, you bring light to a lot of issues such as this that some people may not be aware of.

    ReplyDelete